PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVT vs. LFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVT vs. LFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVT achieves a 70.61% return, which is significantly lower than LFUS's 93.65% return.


NVT

1D
1.07%
1M
9.11%
YTD
70.61%
6M
65.12%
1Y
170.38%
3Y*
57.16%
5Y*
41.68%
10Y*

LFUS

1D
5.27%
1M
20.06%
YTD
93.65%
6M
93.22%
1Y
142.95%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
16.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVT vs. LFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NVT
nVent Electric plc
70.61%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%0.18%
LFUS
Littelfuse, Inc.
93.65%8.65%-10.98%22.71%-29.38%24.46%34.51%12.74%-7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NVT and LFUS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2018

0.59

The correlation between NVT and LFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVT:

$28.44B

LFUS:

$12.40B

EPS

NVT:

$3.00

LFUS:

-$1.60

PS Ratio

NVT:

6.58

LFUS:

4.91

PB Ratio

NVT:

7.49

LFUS:

4.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVT:

$4.33B

LFUS:

$2.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVT:

$1.60B

LFUS:

$952.94M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVT:

$857.60M

LFUS:

$229.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVT vs. LFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LFUS
LFUS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVT vs. LFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVTLFUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.27

3.88

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.58

4.44

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.55

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.78

7.10

+2.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

34.39

24.54

+9.85

NVT vs. LFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVT Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is comparable to the LFUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVT and LFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVTLFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

3.88

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.43

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.36

+0.46

Drawdowns

NVT vs. LFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVT drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, smaller than the maximum LFUS drawdown of -82.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVT and LFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVTLFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-82.44%

+26.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.93%

-19.75%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.67%

-50.68%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.67%

-53.29%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-22.88%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

5.72%

-0.90%

Volatility

NVT vs. LFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for nVent Electric plc (NVT) is 10.72%, while Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that NVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVTLFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

13.22%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.29%

29.21%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.23%

37.06%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.84%

34.34%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.35%

35.04%

+3.31%

Dividends

NVT vs. LFUS - Dividend Comparison

NVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than LFUS's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFUS
Littelfuse, Inc.
0.61%1.15%1.15%0.93%1.03%0.64%0.75%0.95%0.93%0.71%0.82%1.01%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.47%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVT vs. LFUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between nVent Electric plc and Littelfuse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.24B
656.97M
(NVT) Total Revenue
(LFUS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVT vs. LFUS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between nVent Electric plc and Littelfuse, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%20222023202420252026
35.9%
38.7%
Portfolio components
NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

LFUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 254.15M and revenue of 656.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

LFUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported an operating income of 101.17M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

LFUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Littelfuse, Inc. reported a net income of 75.15M and revenue of 656.97M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVT and LFUS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFUS has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to NVT (10.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVT dropped -56.18% vs LFUS's -82.44%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 3.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVT and LFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer