PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRT vs. FTAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRT vs. FTAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 89.56% return, which is significantly higher than FTAI's 34.37% return.


VRT

1D
0.99%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
89.56%
6M
85.43%
1Y
141.67%
3Y*
131.69%
5Y*
62.40%
10Y*

FTAI

1D
1.36%
1M
1.26%
YTD
34.37%
6M
53.05%
1Y
123.99%
3Y*
105.61%
5Y*
55.87%
10Y*
48.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. FTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
89.56%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%
FTAI
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC
34.37%38.01%214.72%181.65%-36.67%29.27%33.15%48.05%-19.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and FTAI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRT:

$120.37B

FTAI:

$27.48B

EPS

VRT:

$3.98

FTAI:

$5.12

PE Ratio

VRT:

77.09

FTAI:

51.47

PEG Ratio

VRT:

0.34

FTAI:

0.03

PS Ratio

VRT:

11.08

FTAI:

9.67

PB Ratio

VRT:

28.36

FTAI:

63.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRT:

$10.84B

FTAI:

$2.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRT:

$3.92B

FTAI:

$922.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

VRT:

$2.35B

FTAI:

$992.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRT vs. FTAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FTAI
FTAI Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. FTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTFTAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.63

4.00

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

10.01

+4.48

VRT vs. FTAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FTAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and FTAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRT vs. FTAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, roughly equal to the maximum FTAI drawdown of -72.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and FTAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTFTAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-72.79%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.32%

-31.15%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-52.11%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.24%

-52.42%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.39%

-14.68%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.22%

-17.36%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.82%

12.49%

-2.67%

Volatility

VRT vs. FTAI - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 22.16% compared to Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) at 16.63%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTFTAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.16%

16.63%

+5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.18%

48.32%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.42%

63.77%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.41%

56.56%

+5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.84%

51.19%

+3.65%

Dividends

VRT vs. FTAI - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than FTAI's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAI
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC
0.57%0.64%0.83%2.59%7.54%4.56%5.63%6.76%9.21%6.62%9.92%4.26%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VRT vs. FTAI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.65B
830.70M
(VRT) Total Revenue
(FTAI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VRT vs. FTAI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
37.7%
36.9%
Portfolio components
VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

FTAI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported a gross profit of 306.43M and revenue of 830.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

FTAI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported an operating income of 241.44M and revenue of 830.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

FTAI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported a net income of 134.19M and revenue of 830.70M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRT and FTAI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (22.16%) compared to FTAI (16.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs FTAI's -72.79%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRT and FTAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer