FTAI vs. BULZ

In the year-to-date period, FTAI achieves a -27.00% return, which is significantly higher than BULZ's -38.55% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FTAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAI and BULZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FTAI drawdown since its inception was -72.79%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAI and BULZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) is 33.47%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 59.79%. This indicates that FTAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.