VRT vs. ALMU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and ALMU (Aeluma, Inc) are both stocks. VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while ALMU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, VRT returned 138.33%/yr vs 113.21%/yr for ALMU. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRT vs. ALMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 86.99% return, which is significantly higher than ALMU's 46.77% return.

VRT

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -18.35%
• YTD: 86.99%
• 6M: 87.85%
• 1Y: 173.26%
• 3Y*: 138.33%
• 5Y*: 63.29%
• 10Y*: —

ALMU

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 46.77%
• 6M: 38.84%
• 1Y: 88.27%
• 3Y*: 113.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. ALMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	86.99%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-7.00%
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	46.77%	124.44%	163.79%	38.10%	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and ALMU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022	0.13

The correlation between VRT and ALMU shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap VRT : $118.76B ALMU : $437.33M
EPS VRT : $3.99 ALMU : -$0.36
PS Ratio VRT : 10.92 ALMU : 81.48
PB Ratio VRT : 27.98 ALMU : 10.91
Total Revenue (TTM) VRT : $10.84B ALMU : $5.20M
Gross Profit (TTM) VRT : $3.92B ALMU : $2.17M
EBITDA (TTM) VRT : $2.35B ALMU : -$6.01M

Return for Risk

VRT vs. ALMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 94
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 62
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. ALMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRT	ALMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	0.36	+2.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	1.50	+1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.18	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.55	0.85	+5.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.79	1.62	+16.17

VRT vs. ALMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the ALMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and ALMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VRT vs. ALMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than ALMU's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and ALMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRT	ALMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.24%	-55.37%	-15.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.32%	-55.37%	+30.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.28%	-55.37%	-5.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.50%	-19.97%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.23%	-23.50%	+7.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.30%	29.25%	-19.95%

Volatility

VRT vs. ALMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) is 16.12%, while Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a volatility of 44.76%. This indicates that VRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRT	ALMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.12%	44.76%	-28.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.82%	95.20%	-49.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.29%	130.67%	-72.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.88%	123.75%	-61.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.61%	123.75%	-69.14%

Dividends

VRT vs. ALMU - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while ALMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRT and ALMU in my portfolio?

VRT and ALMU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VRT or ALMU?

ALMU has higher volatility (44.76%) compared to VRT (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs ALMU's -55.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.