ALMU vs. IONQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ).

Performance

ALMU vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALMU vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	-23.76%	124.44%	163.79%	38.10%	5.00%
IONQ IonQ, Inc.	-35.75%	7.42%	237.13%	259.13%	-34.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALMU : $234.00M IONQ : $10.64B
EPS ALMU : -$0.17 IONQ : -$1.67
PS Ratio ALMU : 41.59 IONQ : 67.59
PB Ratio ALMU : 5.73 IONQ : 2.80
Total Revenue (TTM) ALMU : $5.23M IONQ : $130.02M
Gross Profit (TTM) ALMU : $2.62M IONQ : $52.53M
EBITDA (TTM) ALMU : -$5.05M IONQ : -$429.34M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMU achieves a -23.76% return, which is significantly higher than IONQ's -35.75% return.

ALMU

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -15.38%
• YTD: -23.76%
• 6M: -18.70%
• 1Y: 81.55%
• 3Y*: 53.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IONQ

• 1D: 8.42%
• 1M: -24.86%
• YTD: -35.75%
• 6M: -53.12%
• 1Y: 30.63%
• 3Y*: 67.36%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALMU vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 70
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

IONQ

IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 56
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMU vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALMU	IONQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.32	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	1.26	+0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.14	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	0.39	+1.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.21	0.80	+2.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALMU vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMU and IONQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALMU	IONQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.32	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.21	+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between ALMU and IONQ is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ALMU vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALMU nor IONQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ALMU vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMU drawdown since its inception was -50.08%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMU and IONQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALMU	IONQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.08%	-90.00%	+39.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.08%	-67.61%	+17.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-90.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.55%	-64.88%	+19.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.46%	-51.36%	+27.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.89%	32.67%	-5.78%

Volatility

ALMU vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a higher volatility of 20.72% compared to IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) at 16.38%. This indicates that ALMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALMU	IONQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.72%	16.38%	+4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.80%	66.45%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.06%	96.73%	+17.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	119.28%	98.06%	+21.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.28%	96.99%	+22.29%

Financials