ALMU vs. ALNT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ALMU (Aeluma, Inc) and ALNT (Allient Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ALMU in Semiconductors, ALNT in Electronic Components. Over the past 3 years, ALMU returned 61.16%/yr vs 31.38%/yr for ALNT. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

ALMU vs. ALNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Allient Inc. (ALNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMU achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than ALNT's 62.90% return.

ALMU

• 1D: 5.68%
• 1M: -14.06%
• 6M: 2.60%
• YTD: -5.65%
• 1Y: -22.19%
• 3Y*: 61.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 75.89%

ALNT

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 0.66%
• 6M: 43.51%
• YTD: 62.90%
• 1Y: 130.59%
• 3Y*: 31.38%
• 5Y*: 22.01%
• 10Y*: 19.71%
• ALL TIME*: 11.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	$7.67M	$8.40M	$26.37M
ALNT Allient Inc.	$20.85M	$23.65M	$24.15M

ALMU vs. ALNT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	-5.65%	124.44%	163.79%	38.10%	5.00%
ALNT Allient Inc.	62.90%	122.15%	-19.26%	-12.91%	-3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMU and ALNT is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022	0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALMU : $296.55M ALNT : $1.49B
EPS ALMU : -$0.35 ALNT : $1.42
PS Ratio ALMU : 53.39 ALNT : 2.62
PB Ratio ALMU : 7.01 ALNT : 4.83
Total Revenue (TTM) ALMU : $5.20M ALNT : $560.59M
Gross Profit (TTM) ALMU : $2.17M ALNT : $178.09M
EBITDA (TTM) ALMU : -$6.01M ALNT : $70.63M

Return for Risk

ALMU vs. ALNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 36
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 26

ALNT

ALNT Risk / Return Rank: 92
ALNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ALNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ALNT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ALNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ALNT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ALMU vs. ALNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Allient Inc. (ALNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALMU	ALNT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	2.15	-2.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	2.60	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.33	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	5.08	-5.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.89	14.97	-15.85

ALMU vs. ALNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMU Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the ALNT Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMU and ALNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALMU vs. ALNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMU drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum ALNT drawdown of -92.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMU and ALNT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALMU	ALNT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-92.45%	+37.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.94%	-23.28%	-31.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.37%	-52.88%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.88%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.56%	-15.03%	-33.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.13%	-47.33%	+23.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.32%	7.89%	+22.43%

Volatility

ALMU vs. ALNT - Volatility Comparison

Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a higher volatility of 27.00% compared to Allient Inc. (ALNT) at 20.59%. This indicates that ALMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALMU	ALNT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.00%	20.59%	+6.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	94.94%	43.84%	+51.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	124.20%	55.07%	+69.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	122.72%	48.36%	+74.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	122.72%	48.32%	+74.40%

Dividends

ALMU vs. ALNT - Dividend Comparison

ALMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ALNT Allient Inc.	0.15%	0.22%	0.49%	0.38%	0.29%	0.26%	0.23%	0.25%	0.26%	0.30%	0.47%	0.38%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALMU and ALNT in my portfolio?

ALMU and ALNT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALMU or ALNT?

ALMU has higher volatility (27.00%) compared to ALNT (20.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMU dropped -55.37% vs ALNT's -92.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.