ALMU vs. ALNT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Allient Inc. (ALNT).

Performance

ALMU vs. ALNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Allient Inc. (ALNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALMU vs. ALNT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	-23.76%	124.44%	163.79%	38.10%	5.00%
ALNT Allient Inc.	9.99%	122.15%	-19.26%	-12.91%	-2.55%

Fundamentals

EPS ALMU : -$0.17 ALNT : $1.11
PS Ratio ALMU : 41.59 ALNT : 1.86
Total Revenue (TTM) ALMU : $5.23M ALNT : $533.13M
Gross Profit (TTM) ALMU : $2.62M ALNT : $170.54M
EBITDA (TTM) ALMU : -$5.05M ALNT : $71.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMU achieves a -23.76% return, which is significantly lower than ALNT's 9.99% return.

ALMU

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -15.38%
• YTD: -23.76%
• 6M: -18.70%
• 1Y: 81.55%
• 3Y*: 53.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALNT

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -10.21%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 6M: 32.19%
• 1Y: 169.58%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 11.53%
• 10Y*: 17.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALMU vs. ALNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 70
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

ALNT

ALNT Risk / Return Rank: 97
ALNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ALNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ALNT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ALNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ALNT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMU vs. ALNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and Allient Inc. (ALNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALMU	ALNT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	3.37	-2.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	3.94	-2.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.47	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	11.20	-9.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.21	32.75	-29.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALMU vs. ALNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the ALNT Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMU and ALNT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALMU	ALNT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	3.37	-2.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.12	+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between ALMU and ALNT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ALMU vs. ALNT - Dividend Comparison

ALMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ALNT Allient Inc.	0.20%	0.22%	0.49%	0.38%	0.29%	0.26%	0.23%	0.25%	0.26%	0.30%	0.47%	0.38%

Drawdowns

ALMU vs. ALNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMU drawdown since its inception was -50.08%, smaller than the maximum ALNT drawdown of -92.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMU and ALNT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALMU	ALNT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.08%	-92.45%	+42.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.08%	-14.59%	-35.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.88%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.55%	-14.16%	-31.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.46%	-47.72%	+24.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.89%	4.99%	+21.90%

Volatility

ALMU vs. ALNT - Volatility Comparison

Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a higher volatility of 20.72% compared to Allient Inc. (ALNT) at 18.04%. This indicates that ALMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALMU	ALNT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.72%	18.04%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.80%	35.57%	+31.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.06%	50.73%	+63.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	119.28%	46.15%	+73.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.28%	47.49%	+71.79%

Financials