VRSN vs. CLSE
VRSN (VeriSign, Inc.) is a stock, while CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) is Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence. Over the past 3 years, VRSN returned 13.94%/yr vs 30.39%/yr for CLSE. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VRSN vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VRSN having a 23.81% return and CLSE slightly higher at 24.81%.
VRSN
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.01%
CLSE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 44.76%
- 3Y*
- 30.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.23M | $12.23M | $10.07M | |
VRSN VeriSign, Inc. | $284.01M | $228.97M | $237.88M |
VRSN vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRSN VeriSign, Inc. | 23.81% | 18.41% | 0.49% | 0.25% | -1.34% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 24.81% | 20.44% | 35.54% | 17.54% | -4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRSN and CLSE is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022 | 0.21 |
The correlation between VRSN and CLSE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRSN vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank
VRSN
CLSE
VRSN vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRSN | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.57 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 9.27 | -8.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 31.26 | -30.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRSN vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRSN drawdown since its inception was -98.37%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRSN and CLSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRSN | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.37% | -16.45% | -81.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.42% | -4.85% | -21.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.21% | -16.45% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -0.99% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.76% | -3.52% | -53.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.54% | 1.44% | +11.10% |
Volatility
VRSN vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison
VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) has a higher volatility of 10.39% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 2.81%. This indicates that VRSN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRSN | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.39% | 2.81% | +7.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.15% | 10.76% | +13.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.20% | 13.71% | +14.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 13.86% | +11.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.45% | 13.86% | +12.59% |
Dividends
VRSN vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison
VRSN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than CLSE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.76% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.21% | 0.85% |
VRSN VeriSign, Inc. | 1.06% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRSN and CLSE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRSN has higher volatility (10.39%) compared to CLSE (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRSN dropped -98.37% vs CLSE's -16.45%.
CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRSN and CLSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer