PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRSN vs. YUMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRSN vs. YUMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRSN achieves a 20.14% return, which is significantly higher than YUMC's 2.15% return.


VRSN

1D
1.20%
1M
13.10%
6M
19.51%
YTD
20.14%
1Y
10.65%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
13.33%
ALL TIME*
15.89%

YUMC

1D
3.68%
1M
15.54%
6M
-1.32%
YTD
2.15%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
-3.92%
5Y*
-3.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$276.95M$224.31M$234.42M
$83.56M$77.94M$75.54M

VRSN vs. YUMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRSN
VeriSign, Inc.
20.14%18.41%0.49%0.25%-19.06%17.29%12.31%29.93%29.58%50.44%
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
2.15%1.18%15.41%-21.60%10.75%-11.99%19.48%44.85%-15.28%53.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VRSN and YUMC is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2016

0.24

The correlation between VRSN and YUMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRSN:

$26.22B

YUMC:

$16.82B

EPS

VRSN:

$9.21

YUMC:

$2.73

PE Ratio

VRSN:

31.48

YUMC:

17.65

PEG Ratio

VRSN:

4.62

YUMC:

1.18

PS Ratio

VRSN:

15.67

YUMC:

1.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRSN:

$1.71B

YUMC:

$12.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRSN:

$1.51B

YUMC:

$1.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRSN:

$1.20B

YUMC:

$1.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRSN vs. YUMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRSN
VRSN Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VRSN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRSN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRSN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VRSN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRSN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

YUMC
YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRSN vs. YUMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRSNYUMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.06

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

0.19

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

0.42

+0.32

VRSN vs. YUMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRSN Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the YUMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRSN and YUMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRSN vs. YUMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRSN drawdown since its inception was -98.37%, which is greater than YUMC's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRSN and YUMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRSNYUMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.37%

-56.49%

-41.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.42%

-29.82%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.21%

-48.98%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

-53.84%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-25.30%

+18.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.77%

-19.67%

-37.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.54%

13.37%

-0.83%

Volatility

VRSN vs. YUMC - Volatility Comparison

VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) at 7.38%. This indicates that VRSN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRSNYUMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

7.38%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.98%

19.44%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.02%

25.95%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.67%

37.32%

-11.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.43%

35.57%

-9.14%

Dividends

VRSN vs. YUMC - Dividend Comparison

VRSN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than YUMC's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRSN
VeriSign, Inc.
1.09%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
2.20%2.01%1.33%1.23%0.88%0.96%0.42%1.00%1.25%0.25%

Financials

VRSN vs. YUMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between VeriSign, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

VRSN vs. YUMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between VeriSign, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

VRSN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 384.60M and revenue of 434.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.5%.

YUMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VRSN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported an operating income of 296.30M and revenue of 434.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.2%.

YUMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 348.00M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

VRSN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported a net income of 216.50M and revenue of 434.60M, resulting in a net margin of 49.8%.

YUMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 244.00M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRSN and YUMC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRSN has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to YUMC (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRSN dropped -98.37% vs YUMC's -56.49%.

VRSN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRSN and YUMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer