VRRM vs. FER.AS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VRRM (Verra Mobility Corporation) and FER.AS (Ferrovial SE) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — VRRM in Security & Protection Services, FER.AS in Infrastructure Operations. Over the past 3 years, VRRM returned -38.03%/yr vs 34.01%/yr for FER.AS. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRRM vs. FER.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) and Ferrovial SE (FER.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VRRM is traded in USD, while FER.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FER.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRRM achieves a -80.05% return, which is significantly lower than FER.AS's 8.23% return.

VRRM

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -66.86%
• YTD: -80.05%
• 6M: -80.13%
• 1Y: -81.51%
• 3Y*: -38.03%
• 5Y*: -21.80%
• 10Y*: —

FER.AS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 8.23%
• 6M: 6.24%
• 1Y: 43.11%
• 3Y*: 34.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRRM vs. FER.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VRRM Verra Mobility Corporation	-80.05%	-7.32%	4.99%	23.35%
FER.AS Ferrovial SE	8.23%	59.61%	16.48%	16.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VRRM and FER.AS is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023	0.10

Return for Risk

VRRM vs. FER.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRRM

VRRM Risk / Return Rank: 3
VRRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
VRRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
VRRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1
VRRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
VRRM Martin Ratio Rank: 0

FER.AS

FER.AS Risk / Return Rank: 81
FER.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FER.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FER.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FER.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FER.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRRM vs. FER.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) and Ferrovial SE (FER.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRRM	FER.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.02	1.40	-2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	2.02	-3.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.61	1.26	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	2.48	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.52	6.96	-9.48

VRRM vs. FER.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRRM Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the FER.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRRM and FER.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VRRM vs. FER.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRRM drawdown since its inception was -87.52%, which is greater than FER.AS's maximum drawdown of -17.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRRM and FER.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRRM	FER.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.52%	-17.16%	-70.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.99%	-17.16%	-67.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-87.52%	-17.16%	-70.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.51%	-5.65%	-79.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.73%	-5.00%	-10.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.34%	6.14%	+26.20%

Volatility

VRRM vs. FER.AS - Volatility Comparison

Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) has a higher volatility of 126.04% compared to Ferrovial SE (FER.AS) at 6.89%. This indicates that VRRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FER.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRRM	FER.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	126.04%	6.89%	+119.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	127.01%	20.76%	+106.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.32%	30.32%	+50.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.99%	40.17%	+5.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.31%	40.17%	+3.14%

Dividends

VRRM vs. FER.AS - Dividend Comparison

VRRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FER.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FER.AS Ferrovial SE	1.83%	1.58%	1.99%	2.04%
VRRM Verra Mobility Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRRM and FER.AS in my portfolio?

VRRM and FER.AS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.