PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRRM vs. RCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRRM vs. RCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) and RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRRM achieves a -81.57% return, which is significantly lower than RCMT's 15.58% return.


VRRM

1D
-0.72%
1M
-71.98%
YTD
-81.57%
6M
-81.24%
1Y
-82.88%
3Y*
-39.50%
5Y*
-22.31%
10Y*

RCMT

1D
3.14%
1M
-24.17%
YTD
15.58%
6M
17.15%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
45.69%
10Y*
17.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRRM vs. RCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRRM
Verra Mobility Corporation
-81.57%-7.32%4.99%66.52%-10.37%14.98%-4.07%43.34%-1.81%-0.60%
RCMT
RCM Technologies, Inc.
15.58%-7.74%-23.69%135.33%73.31%243.96%-31.00%-3.23%-50.40%49.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VRRM and RCMT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRRM:

$634.74M

RCMT:

$179.94M

EPS

VRRM:

$0.82

RCMT:

$2.11

PE Ratio

VRRM:

5.02

RCMT:

11.22

PEG Ratio

VRRM:

0.05

RCMT:

0.39

PS Ratio

VRRM:

0.67

RCMT:

0.56

PB Ratio

VRRM:

2.33

RCMT:

4.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRRM:

$979.39M

RCMT:

$317.97M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRRM:

$954.50M

RCMT:

$87.99M

EBITDA (TTM)

VRRM:

$371.82M

RCMT:

$26.19M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRRM vs. RCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRRM
VRRM Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VRRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRRM Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
VRRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRRM Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

RCMT
RCMT Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRRM vs. RCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) and RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRRMRCMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.56

1.08

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

0.13

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-3.08

0.23

-3.30

VRRM vs. RCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRRM Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the RCMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRRM and RCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRRMRCMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.06

0.09

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

0.72

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.14

-0.35

Drawdowns

VRRM vs. RCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRRM drawdown since its inception was -87.52%, smaller than the maximum RCMT drawdown of -97.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRRM and RCMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRRMRCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.52%

-97.05%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.99%

-36.16%

-48.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.52%

-53.15%

-34.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.52%

-63.14%

-24.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.61%

-25.95%

-60.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-64.93%

+49.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.92%

20.31%

+6.61%

Volatility

VRRM vs. RCMT - Volatility Comparison

Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) has a higher volatility of 124.20% compared to RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) at 25.46%. This indicates that VRRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRRMRCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

124.20%

25.46%

+98.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

125.93%

45.08%

+80.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.42%

53.36%

+25.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.42%

63.80%

-18.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.08%

66.25%

-23.17%

Dividends

VRRM vs. RCMT - Dividend Comparison

Neither VRRM nor RCMT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCMT
RCM Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%16.00%0.00%18.18%
VRRM
Verra Mobility Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VRRM vs. RCMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Verra Mobility Corporation and RCM Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
223.57M
83.04M
(VRRM) Total Revenue
(RCMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VRRM vs. RCMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Verra Mobility Corporation and RCM Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
96.7%
26.5%
Portfolio components
VRRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verra Mobility Corporation reported a gross profit of 216.18M and revenue of 223.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.7%.

RCMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCM Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.02M and revenue of 83.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.

VRRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verra Mobility Corporation reported an operating income of 51.80M and revenue of 223.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

RCMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCM Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.94M and revenue of 83.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

VRRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verra Mobility Corporation reported a net income of 26.74M and revenue of 223.57M, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

RCMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCM Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 3.84M and revenue of 83.04M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRRM and RCMT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRRM has higher volatility (124.20%) compared to RCMT (25.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRRM dropped -87.52% vs RCMT's -97.05%.

RCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRRM and RCMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer