PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VRRM vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VRRM and ^GSPC is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

VRRM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.82%
6.72%
VRRM
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VRRM:

0.59

^GSPC:

1.62

Sortino Ratio

VRRM:

0.96

^GSPC:

2.20

Omega Ratio

VRRM:

1.13

^GSPC:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

VRRM:

0.61

^GSPC:

2.46

Martin Ratio

VRRM:

1.24

^GSPC:

10.01

Ulcer Index

VRRM:

13.00%

^GSPC:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

VRRM:

27.17%

^GSPC:

12.88%

Max Drawdown

VRRM:

-65.65%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

VRRM:

-15.86%

^GSPC:

-2.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRRM achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 2.24% return.


VRRM

YTD

7.32%

1M

0.19%

6M

-6.82%

1Y

19.86%

5Y*

8.85%

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

2.24%

1M

-1.20%

6M

6.72%

1Y

18.21%

5Y*

12.53%

10Y*

11.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VRRM vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRRM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VRRM is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VRRM is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VRRM is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VRRM is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VRRM is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VRRM is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VRRM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VRRM, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.591.62
The chart of Sortino ratio for VRRM, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.962.20
The chart of Omega ratio for VRRM, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for VRRM, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.612.46
The chart of Martin ratio for VRRM, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.2410.01
VRRM
^GSPC

The current VRRM Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRRM and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.59
1.62
VRRM
^GSPC

Drawdowns

VRRM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRRM drawdown since its inception was -65.65%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRRM and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-15.86%
-2.13%
VRRM
^GSPC

Volatility

VRRM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.43%. This indicates that VRRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.81%
3.43%
VRRM
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab