PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRP vs. PFFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRP vs. PFFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRP achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than PFFD's 2.29% return.


VRP

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.11%
6M
2.32%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
5.23%

PFFD

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.16%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.67%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRP vs. PFFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
2.11%7.34%11.10%10.35%-9.00%4.20%5.11%18.84%-6.62%0.02%
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
2.29%3.22%7.07%6.85%-20.20%5.07%8.90%17.43%-3.94%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VRP and PFFD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.55

The correlation between VRP and PFFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

VRP vs. PFFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VRP
PFFD

Financial Services

41.3%
59.1%

Utilities

17.0%
15.3%

Energy

7.5%

-

Communication Services

4.5%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.8%
4.0%

Healthcare

1.7%
0.8%

Industrials

1.4%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%
3.0%

Technology

-

6.3%

Financial Services

VRP
41.3%
PFFD
59.1%

Utilities

VRP
17.0%
PFFD
15.3%

Energy

VRP
7.5%
PFFD

-

Communication Services

VRP
4.5%
PFFD
4.4%

Real Estate

VRP
2.8%
PFFD
4.0%

Healthcare

VRP
1.7%
PFFD
0.8%

Industrials

VRP
1.4%
PFFD
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VRP
0.7%
PFFD
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

VRP
0.3%
PFFD

-

Basic Materials

VRP
0.2%
PFFD
3.0%

Technology

VRP

-

PFFD
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRP vs. PFFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRP
VRP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFD
PFFD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PFFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRP vs. PFFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRPPFFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.19

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.29

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

3.81

+9.21

VRP vs. PFFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRP Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the PFFD Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRP and PFFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRPPFFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.07

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

-0.01

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.21

+0.18

Drawdowns

VRP vs. PFFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than PFFD's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and PFFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRPPFFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-30.93%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-5.97%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-10.84%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.76%

-24.45%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-3.68%

+3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-6.59%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

2.01%

-1.47%

Volatility

VRP vs. PFFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) is 0.66%, while Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that VRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRPPFFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

2.09%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

5.32%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

7.19%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

10.98%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

12.76%

+1.77%

VRP vs. PFFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFD's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRP vs. PFFD - Dividend Comparison

VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than PFFD's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
6.37%6.37%6.42%6.49%6.63%5.09%5.17%5.48%6.21%1.94%0.00%0.00%
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
6.30%6.53%5.78%6.61%5.38%4.25%4.17%4.71%5.28%4.69%5.10%5.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRP and PFFD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFD has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to VRP (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRP dropped -46.04% vs PFFD's -30.93%.

On 5-year performance, VRP leads with 4.38% vs -0.16% for PFFD. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, VRP has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VRP has performed better with a 4.38% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRP.

PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 6.30% for VRP.

VRP tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index, while PFFD tracks ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VRP and 0.23% for PFFD.

VRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRP and PFFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer