VRP vs. PFFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV).
VRP and PFFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VRP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index. It was launched on May 1, 2014. PFFV is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2020. Both VRP and PFFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VRP or PFFV.
Performance
VRP vs. PFFV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRP achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than PFFV's 9.90% return.
VRP
10.56%
-0.56%
4.48%
14.93%
4.21%
5.03%
PFFV
9.90%
-0.23%
5.04%
12.99%
N/A
N/A
Key characteristics
VRP | PFFV | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 3.21 | 2.03 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.81 | 2.98 |
Omega Ratio | 1.65 | 1.38 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.56 | 1.57 |
Martin Ratio | 33.08 | 14.33 |
Ulcer Index | 0.45% | 0.93% |
Daily Std Dev | 4.61% | 6.56% |
Max Drawdown | -46.04% | -18.95% |
Current Drawdown | -0.81% | -1.92% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VRP vs. PFFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between VRP and PFFV is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VRP vs. PFFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VRP vs. PFFV - Dividend Comparison
VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than PFFV's 7.33% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 5.97% | 6.61% | 5.38% | 4.26% | 4.18% | 5.15% | 5.28% | 4.68% | 5.10% | 5.02% | 3.04% |
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 7.33% | 7.17% | 6.60% | 5.25% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VRP vs. PFFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than PFFV's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and PFFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VRP vs. PFFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) is 1.23%, while Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that VRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.