PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRP vs. EPRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRP vs. EPRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRP achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than EPRF's -2.39% return.


VRP

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.11%
6M
2.32%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
5.23%

EPRF

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRP vs. EPRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
2.11%7.34%11.10%10.35%-9.00%4.20%5.11%18.84%-6.62%0.07%
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
-2.39%2.69%3.46%9.43%-20.68%1.37%7.38%19.54%-5.58%-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VRP and EPRF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.52

The correlation between VRP and EPRF shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VRP vs. EPRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VRP
EPRF

Financial Services

41.3%
55.9%

Utilities

17.0%

-

Energy

7.5%

-

Communication Services

4.5%

-

Real Estate

2.8%
7.6%

Healthcare

1.7%

-

Industrials

1.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

VRP
41.3%
EPRF
55.9%

Utilities

VRP
17.0%
EPRF

-

Energy

VRP
7.5%
EPRF

-

Communication Services

VRP
4.5%
EPRF

-

Real Estate

VRP
2.8%
EPRF
7.6%

Healthcare

VRP
1.7%
EPRF

-

Industrials

VRP
1.4%
EPRF

-

Consumer Cyclical

VRP
0.7%
EPRF

-

Consumer Defensive

VRP
0.3%
EPRF

-

Basic Materials

VRP
0.2%
EPRF

-

Technology

VRP

-

EPRF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRP vs. EPRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRP
VRP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EPRF
EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRP vs. EPRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRPEPRFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.05

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.24

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

0.51

+12.51

VRP vs. EPRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRP Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the EPRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRP and EPRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRPEPRFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

0.27

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

-0.17

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.08

+0.30

Drawdowns

VRP vs. EPRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than EPRF's maximum drawdown of -26.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and EPRF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRPEPRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-26.82%

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-8.59%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-12.29%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.76%

-25.23%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-11.06%

+10.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-7.37%

+5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

4.01%

-3.47%

Volatility

VRP vs. EPRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) is 0.66%, while Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that VRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRPEPRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

2.14%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

5.46%

-3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

7.55%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

11.81%

-5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

13.49%

+1.04%

VRP vs. EPRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EPRF's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRP vs. EPRF - Dividend Comparison

VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than EPRF's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
6.18%6.03%6.13%5.71%5.67%4.70%4.92%5.01%5.27%2.59%0.00%0.00%
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
6.30%6.53%5.78%6.61%5.38%4.25%4.17%4.71%5.28%4.69%5.10%5.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRP and EPRF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPRF has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to VRP (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRP dropped -46.04% vs EPRF's -26.82%.

On 5-year performance, VRP leads with 4.38% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, VRP has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VRP has performed better with a 4.38% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRP.

VRP has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 6.18% for EPRF.

VRP tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index, while EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VRP and 0.47% for EPRF.

VRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRP and EPRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer