PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRNA vs. EAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRNA vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verona Pharma plc (VRNA) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VRNA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAT

1D
4.04%
1M
5.38%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.69%
1Y
-14.86%
3Y*
59.52%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRNA vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRNA
Verona Pharma plc
0.00%130.21%133.60%-23.92%288.84%-4.00%21.74%-40.41%-18.71%-12.07%
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
1.83%8.49%206.37%35.32%-12.79%-35.32%36.16%-0.92%17.27%-11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VRNA and EAT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2017

0.11

The correlation between VRNA and EAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRNA:

$9.72B

EAT:

$6.50B

EPS

VRNA:

-$0.69

EAT:

$10.14

PS Ratio

VRNA:

57.97

EAT:

1.16

PB Ratio

VRNA:

34.92

EAT:

16.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRNA:

$167.65M

EAT:

$5.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRNA:

$159.52M

EAT:

$3.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRNA:

-$40.86M

EAT:

$807.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRNA vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRNA

EAT
EAT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRNA vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verona Pharma plc (VRNA) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VRNA vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRNAEATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

Drawdowns

VRNA vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRNAEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.68%

Volatility

VRNA vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRNAEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.09%

Dividends

VRNA vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither VRNA nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%3.62%3.46%3.71%2.67%2.50%
VRNA
Verona Pharma plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VRNA vs. EAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Verona Pharma plc and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
75.14M
1.47B
(VRNA) Total Revenue
(EAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VRNA vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Verona Pharma plc and Brinker International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.4%
74.6%
Portfolio components
VRNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a gross profit of 71.68M and revenue of 75.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.4%.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

VRNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported an operating income of 9.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

VRNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a net income of 8.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRNA and EAT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRNA and EAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer