PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRIG vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRIG achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return.


VRIG

1D
0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.20%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
1.81%5.05%6.81%7.37%0.99%1.06%1.76%4.57%0.51%3.20%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VRIG and SPHQ is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.11

The correlation between VRIG and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VRIG
SPHQ

Financial Services

23.3%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.8%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.7%
15.4%

Technology

0.4%
28.1%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Utilities

0.1%
1.0%

Industrials

0.0%
24.3%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Energy

-

0.7%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Financial Services

VRIG
23.3%
SPHQ
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VRIG
3.0%
SPHQ
4.6%

Basic Materials

VRIG
0.8%
SPHQ
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

VRIG
0.7%
SPHQ
15.4%

Technology

VRIG
0.4%
SPHQ
28.1%

Real Estate

VRIG
0.3%
SPHQ

-

Utilities

VRIG
0.1%
SPHQ
1.0%

Industrials

VRIG
0.0%
SPHQ
24.3%

Communication Services

VRIG

-

SPHQ
2.0%

Energy

VRIG

-

SPHQ
0.7%

Healthcare

VRIG

-

SPHQ
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRIG vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRIG
VRIG Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VRIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRIG Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VRIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRIG Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRIGSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+21.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.38

1.32

+4.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

62.75

2.62

+60.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

320.64

11.17

+309.47

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRIG Sharpe Ratio is 10.15, which is higher than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRIG and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRIGSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15

1.85

+8.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.45

0.89

+2.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.53

+0.38

Drawdowns

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRIG drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRIG and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRIGSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.04%

-57.83%

+44.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.08%

-8.90%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.78%

-16.57%

+15.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.28%

-25.04%

+22.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-10.70%

+10.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

2.08%

-2.06%

Volatility

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) is 0.11%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that VRIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRIGSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

3.49%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

10.18%

-9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49%

12.62%

-12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.29%

16.45%

-15.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

17.86%

-14.06%

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRIG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRIG vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
4.79%4.99%6.09%5.97%2.39%0.78%1.57%3.12%2.89%2.31%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRIG and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRIG dropped -13.04% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.54% vs 4.42% for VRIG. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VRIG.

VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

VRIG is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SPHQ is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VRIG and 0.15% for SPHQ.

VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.15 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRIG and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer