PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPL vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPL vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPL achieves a 21.47% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VPL has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 9.50%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.


VPL

1D
0.72%
1M
-1.92%
6M
11.30%
YTD
21.47%
1Y
38.65%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
9.50%
ALL TIME*
6.52%

VTI

1D
1.53%
1M
1.38%
6M
9.81%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.66%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.40M$44.46M$59.50M
$1.08B$1.16B$1.24B

VPL vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
21.47%32.66%1.68%15.58%-15.20%1.10%16.65%18.16%-14.40%28.85%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.18%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VPL and VTI is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.76

The correlation between VPL and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

VPL vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VPL
VTI

Technology

31.6%
36.1%

Financial Services

17.8%
11.8%

Industrials

17.4%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
9.4%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
9.1%

Healthcare

4.3%
9.7%

Real Estate

3.6%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.3%

Utilities

1.3%
2.2%

Energy

1.1%
3.2%

Technology

VPL
31.6%
VTI
36.1%

Financial Services

VPL
17.8%
VTI
11.8%

Industrials

VPL
17.4%
VTI
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VPL
8.8%
VTI
9.4%

Basic Materials

VPL
6.5%
VTI
1.9%

Communication Services

VPL
4.4%
VTI
9.1%

Healthcare

VPL
4.3%
VTI
9.7%

Real Estate

VPL
3.6%
VTI
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

VPL
3.2%
VTI
4.3%

Utilities

VPL
1.3%
VTI
2.2%

Energy

VPL
1.1%
VTI
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPL vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VPL
VPL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VPL vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPLVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.67

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

11.50

-2.70

VPL vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPL and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPL vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPL drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPL and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPLVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-55.45%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.33%

-8.92%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-19.30%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.09%

-25.36%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-35.00%

+1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.04%

0.00%

-9.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-7.98%

-3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

2.07%

+2.33%

Volatility

VPL vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.78%. This indicates that VPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPLVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

3.78%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.71%

10.33%

+11.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.81%

13.08%

+10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

17.53%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

18.31%

-0.58%

VPL vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VPL vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

VPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
2.76%4.01%3.15%3.12%2.75%3.19%1.81%2.84%3.06%2.57%2.65%2.43%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPL and VTI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPL has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to VTI (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPL dropped -55.49% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.66% vs 9.50% for VPL. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VPL.

VPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.

VPL is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VPL tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VPL and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPL and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer