VPC vs. PFFA
VPC (Virtus Private Credit ETF) and PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPC is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Indxx Private Credit Index, while PFFA is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. VPC is passively managed, while PFFA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VPC returned 0.39%/yr vs 6.09%/yr for PFFA. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPC charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for PFFA.
Performance
VPC vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPC achieves a -12.79% return, which is significantly lower than PFFA's 2.26% return.
VPC
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- -12.79%
- 6M
- -11.42%
- 1Y
- -15.79%
- 3Y*
- 1.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFA
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- —
VPC vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | -12.79% | -6.75% | 10.52% | 22.20% | -11.70% | 34.18% | -9.50% | 9.25% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 2.26% | 8.22% | 16.11% | 26.45% | -20.91% | 23.53% | -7.87% | 22.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPC and PFFA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019 | 0.51 |
The correlation between VPC and PFFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPC vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank
VPC
PFFA
VPC vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VPC | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.30 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 1.79 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 5.90 | -7.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VPC vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPC drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPC and PFFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPC | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.45% | -70.52% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.76% | -6.49% | -16.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.86% | -12.15% | -12.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -22.70% | -2.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.76% | -2.28% | -20.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -6.62% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.20% | 1.96% | +10.24% |
Volatility
VPC vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 2.13%. This indicates that VPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPC | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 2.13% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 5.91% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 7.16% | +6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 11.54% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 31.74% | -11.22% |
VPC vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
VPC vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison
VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.70%, more than PFFA's 9.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 9.79% | 9.47% | 9.18% | 9.56% | 10.75% | 7.64% | 8.54% | 10.02% | 5.15% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | 16.70% | 14.33% | 11.26% | 11.71% | 10.74% | 6.31% | 10.06% | 8.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPC and PFFA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPC has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to PFFA (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPC dropped -53.45% vs PFFA's -70.52%.
On 5-year performance, PFFA leads with 6.09% vs 0.39% for VPC. On fees, VPC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PFFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 6.09% return vs 0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.
VPC has the higher dividend yield at 16.70%, compared with 9.79% for PFFA.
VPC is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while PFFA is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VPC and 1.47% for PFFA.
PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPC and PFFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer