VOTE vs. AFOS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

VOTE (Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, VOTE returned 21.92% vs 83.17% for AFOS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOTE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.

Performance

VOTE vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOTE achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 33.60% return.

VOTE

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -1.98%
• YTD: 8.07%
• 6M: 6.78%
• 1Y: 21.92%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: —

AFOS

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 33.60%
• 6M: 31.56%
• 1Y: 83.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOTE vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	8.07%	12.81%
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	33.60%	37.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VOTE and AFOS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

VOTE vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOTE

VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 60
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AFOS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOTE vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOTE	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.58	—	—

Drawdowns

VOTE vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOTE drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOTE and AFOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOTE	AFOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.71%	-11.52%	-14.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.10%	-11.52%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.35%	-2.33%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.09%	-1.43%	-4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VOTE	AFOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.69%	21.58%	-8.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.18%	21.58%	-4.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	21.58%	-4.42%

VOTE vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOTE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOTE vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

VOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	0.96%	1.03%	1.18%	1.33%	1.54%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOTE and AFOS in my portfolio?

VOTE and AFOS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VOTE or AFOS?

On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 83.17% vs 21.92% for VOTE. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOTE or AFOS?

Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 83.17% return vs 21.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOTE or AFOS?

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOTE or AFOS?

VOTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

What is the main difference between VOTE and AFOS?

They also come from different issuers: Engine No. 1 LLC and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOTE and 0.45% for AFOS.