VOT vs. VXUS
VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOT returned 12.21%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for VXUS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VOT vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.45% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 12.21%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.
VOT
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 31.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
VOT vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 9.14% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.45% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOT and VXUS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2011 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VOT and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOT vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOT
VXUS
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
VOT
VXUS
Industrials
VOT
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
VOT
VXUS
Healthcare
VOT
VXUS
Financial Services
VOT
VXUS
Real Estate
VOT
VXUS
Communication Services
VOT
VXUS
Utilities
VOT
VXUS
Energy
VOT
VXUS
Basic Materials
VOT
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
VOT
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOT vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
VOT
VXUS
VOT vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOT | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.38 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 2.80 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 10.92 | -8.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOT | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 2.08 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.53 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.57 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.39 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
VOT vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOT | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -35.97% | -24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -11.27% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.77% | -13.58% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -29.44% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -35.97% | -1.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.82% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -8.22% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 2.88% | +2.44% |
Volatility
VOT vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is 4.30%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that VOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOT | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 5.46% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 13.00% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.79% | 15.20% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 16.04% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 17.15% | +3.83% |
VOT vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VOT and VXUS have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOT vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VXUS's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.65% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOT and VXUS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to VOT (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.21% vs 9.69% for VXUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.21% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOT and VXUS have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.61% for VOT.
VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOT and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer