PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMGMX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMGMX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMGMX achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VMGMX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.16%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


VMGMX

1D
0.95%
1M
5.67%
YTD
8.22%
6M
7.25%
1Y
12.45%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
12.16%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMGMX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMGMX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
8.22%10.69%15.65%23.93%-28.84%20.48%34.45%33.85%-5.61%21.83%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VMGMX and VOO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011

0.90

The correlation between VMGMX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMGMX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMGMX
VOO

Technology

28.9%
35.7%

Industrials

23.7%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
10.2%

Healthcare

9.3%
8.5%

Financial Services

6.8%
11.6%

Real Estate

4.8%
1.9%

Communication Services

3.8%
11.3%

Utilities

3.5%
2.4%

Energy

2.7%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
4.9%

Technology

VMGMX
28.9%
VOO
35.7%

Industrials

VMGMX
23.7%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VMGMX
13.9%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

VMGMX
9.3%
VOO
8.5%

Financial Services

VMGMX
6.8%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

VMGMX
4.8%
VOO
1.9%

Communication Services

VMGMX
3.8%
VOO
11.3%

Utilities

VMGMX
3.5%
VOO
2.4%

Energy

VMGMX
2.7%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

VMGMX
1.8%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VMGMX
0.8%
VOO
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMGMX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMGMX
VMGMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VMGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VMGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMGMX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMGMXVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

2.53

-1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

3.43

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

3.42

-2.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.53

15.95

-13.42

VMGMX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMGMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMGMX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMGMXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.53

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.85

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.87

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.89

-0.25

Drawdowns

VMGMX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMGMX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMGMXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.17%

-33.99%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.95%

-8.90%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.65%

-18.69%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-24.52%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.17%

-33.99%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-3.69%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

1.91%

+3.40%

Volatility

VMGMX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that VMGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMGMXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

2.74%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

8.88%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

11.78%

+4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

16.81%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

18.01%

+2.98%

VMGMX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMGMX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMGMX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VMGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMGMX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.82%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMGMX and VOO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMGMX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMGMX dropped -37.17% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMGMX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer