PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOT vs. JSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOT vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than JSMD's 19.44% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 12.21%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.


VOT

1D
0.69%
1M
5.16%
YTD
9.14%
6M
6.88%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
12.21%

JSMD

1D
1.81%
1M
6.87%
YTD
19.44%
6M
17.09%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
9.14%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
19.44%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and JSMD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2016

0.87

The correlation between VOT and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOT vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOT
JSMD

Technology

28.9%
18.7%

Industrials

23.7%
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
9.4%

Healthcare

9.3%
19.5%

Financial Services

6.8%
9.1%

Real Estate

4.8%
3.8%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.4%

Utilities

3.5%

-

Energy

2.7%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
2.1%

Technology

VOT
28.9%
JSMD
18.7%

Industrials

VOT
23.7%
JSMD
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VOT
13.9%
JSMD
9.4%

Healthcare

VOT
9.3%
JSMD
19.5%

Financial Services

VOT
6.8%
JSMD
9.1%

Real Estate

VOT
4.8%
JSMD
3.8%

Communication Services

VOT
3.8%
JSMD
3.4%

Utilities

VOT
3.5%
JSMD

-

Energy

VOT
2.7%
JSMD
1.7%

Basic Materials

VOT
1.8%
JSMD
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

VOT
0.8%
JSMD
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOT vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOTJSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.03

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

6.86

-4.55

VOT vs. JSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the JSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and JSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOTJSMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.39

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.36

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.60

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.65

-0.19

Drawdowns

VOT vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than JSMD's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and JSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTJSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.16%

-38.98%

-21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-14.86%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.77%

-24.01%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

-32.18%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

-38.98%

+1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-7.48%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

4.40%

+0.92%

Volatility

VOT vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is 4.30%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that VOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTJSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

6.55%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

16.25%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

21.76%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

22.84%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

22.75%

-1.77%

VOT vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOT vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than JSMD's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.46%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOT and JSMD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to VOT (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs JSMD's -38.98%.

On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.52% vs 12.21% for VOT. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.

VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOT and 0.30% for JSMD.

JSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOT and JSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer