PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOT vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOT vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 66.12% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.56% annualized return.


VOT

1D
0.12%
1M
1.80%
YTD
5.49%
6M
3.73%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
11.95%

FSELX

1D
-9.27%
1M
5.76%
YTD
66.12%
6M
60.36%
1Y
135.04%
3Y*
63.14%
5Y*
43.03%
10Y*
37.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
5.49%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
66.12%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and FSELX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006

0.78

The correlation between VOT and FSELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOT vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOTFSELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.57

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

9.48

-8.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

35.79

-34.33

VOT vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOTFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

4.00

-3.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

1.10

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

1.07

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.54

-0.09

Drawdowns

VOT vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.16%

-82.54%

+22.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-14.38%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.77%

-36.31%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

-46.37%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

-46.37%

+9.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-10.89%

+7.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-28.69%

+18.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

3.80%

+1.53%

Volatility

VOT vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is 5.45%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 15.95%. This indicates that VOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

15.95%

-10.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

27.45%

-14.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

34.06%

-17.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

39.17%

-17.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

35.18%

-14.16%

VOT vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOT vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FSELX's 9.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
9.86%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.63%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOT and FSELX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to VOT (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOT and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer