PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOT vs. FEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOT vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VOT

1D
0.69%
1M
5.16%
YTD
9.14%
6M
6.88%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
12.21%

FEMG

1D
0.91%
1M
3.86%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VOT and FEMG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.86

VOT vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOT
FEMG

Technology

28.9%
24.0%

Industrials

23.7%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
17.4%

Healthcare

9.3%
12.6%

Financial Services

6.8%
6.0%

Real Estate

4.8%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.7%

Utilities

3.5%
2.9%

Energy

2.7%
3.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
1.4%

Technology

VOT
28.9%
FEMG
24.0%

Industrials

VOT
23.7%
FEMG
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOT
13.9%
FEMG
17.4%

Healthcare

VOT
9.3%
FEMG
12.6%

Financial Services

VOT
6.8%
FEMG
6.0%

Real Estate

VOT
4.8%
FEMG
1.8%

Communication Services

VOT
3.8%
FEMG
2.7%

Utilities

VOT
3.5%
FEMG
2.9%

Energy

VOT
2.7%
FEMG
3.3%

Basic Materials

VOT
1.8%
FEMG
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

VOT
0.8%
FEMG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOT vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOTFEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

VOT vs. FEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOTFEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

5.84

-5.39

Drawdowns

VOT vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and FEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTFEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.16%

-3.29%

-56.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.28%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-0.93%

-9.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

Volatility

VOT vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTFEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

12.25%

+3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

12.25%

+9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

12.25%

+8.73%

VOT vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOT vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOT and FEMG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FEMG.

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOT and 0.23% for FEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOT and FEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer