VOT vs. AVMC
VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and AVMC (Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while AVMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. VOT is passively managed, while AVMC is actively managed. Over the past year, VOT returned 12.25% vs 24.28% for AVMC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOT charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AVMC.
Performance
VOT vs. AVMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than AVMC's 12.57% return.
VOT
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
AVMC
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOT vs. AVMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 9.14% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 15.55% |
AVMC Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 12.57% | 9.98% | 16.84% | 15.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOT and AVMC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VOT and AVMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOT vs. AVMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOT
AVMC
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
VOT
AVMC
Industrials
VOT
AVMC
Consumer Cyclical
VOT
AVMC
Healthcare
VOT
AVMC
Financial Services
VOT
AVMC
Real Estate
VOT
AVMC
Communication Services
VOT
AVMC
Utilities
VOT
AVMC
Energy
VOT
AVMC
Basic Materials
VOT
AVMC
Consumer Defensive
VOT
AVMC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOT vs. AVMC — Risk / Return Rank
VOT
AVMC
VOT vs. AVMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOT | AVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.31 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 3.09 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 11.53 | -9.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOT | AVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.78 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.32 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
VOT vs. AVMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than AVMC's maximum drawdown of -21.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and AVMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOT | AVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -21.84% | -38.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -7.90% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -3.21% | -6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 2.11% | +3.21% |
Volatility
VOT vs. AVMC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) at 3.39%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOT | AVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 3.39% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 9.94% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.79% | 13.71% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 16.94% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 16.94% | +4.04% |
VOT vs. AVMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AVMC's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOT vs. AVMC - Dividend Comparison
VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than AVMC's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVMC Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.12% | 1.02% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOT and AVMC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOT has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to AVMC (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs AVMC's -21.84%.
On 1-year performance, AVMC leads with 24.28% vs 12.25% for VOT. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, AVMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVMC has performed better with a 24.28% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AVMC.
AVMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.61% for VOT.
VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while AVMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOT and 0.20% for AVMC.
AVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOT and AVMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer