PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOV vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOV vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 11.89%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.54% annualized return.


VOOV

1D
1.06%
1M
2.31%
6M
8.38%
YTD
12.00%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
11.89%
ALL TIME*
12.29%

VGT

1D
4.35%
1M
4.81%
6M
30.81%
YTD
27.80%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
30.95%
5Y*
18.95%
10Y*
24.54%
ALL TIME*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$485.01M$516.15M$578.25M
$18.18M$15.18M$15.44M

VOOV vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
12.00%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
27.80%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and VGT is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between VOOV and VGT has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOOV vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOV
VGT

Technology

21.7%
98.6%

Financial Services

14.9%
0.5%

Healthcare

12.2%
0.0%

Industrials

10.7%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%

-

Energy

6.6%
0.3%

Utilities

4.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%
0.0%

Real Estate

3.3%

-

Communication Services

2.7%
0.5%

Technology

VOOV
21.7%
VGT
98.6%

Financial Services

VOOV
14.9%
VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

VOOV
12.2%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

VOOV
10.7%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOV
10.5%
VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

VOOV
8.8%
VGT

-

Energy

VOOV
6.6%
VGT
0.3%

Utilities

VOOV
4.4%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

VOOV
3.6%
VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

VOOV
3.3%
VGT

-

Communication Services

VOOV
2.7%
VGT
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOV vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOOV vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOVVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.45

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

6.57

+7.05

VOOV vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.31%

-54.63%

+17.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-16.40%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-27.23%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-35.07%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

-35.07%

-2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.35%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-7.95%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

6.10%

-4.48%

Volatility

VOOV vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.69%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

9.26%

-6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

20.52%

-13.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.91%

24.56%

-14.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

25.92%

-11.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

24.93%

-8.04%

VOOV vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOV vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VGT's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.36%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.64%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOV and VGT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to VOOV (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.54% vs 11.89% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.54% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.36% for VGT.

VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.09% for VGT.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOV and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer