PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOV vs. PWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOV vs. PWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 12.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOOV having a 11.82% annualized return and PWV not far behind at 11.81%.


VOOV

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.76%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
11.82%

PWV

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.43%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.38%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOV vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.51%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
12.10%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and PWV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.92

The correlation between VOOV and PWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOV vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOV vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOVPWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.48

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

6.28

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

21.16

-8.12

VOOV vs. PWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the PWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and PWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOVPWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.74

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.88

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.69

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.41

+0.34

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and PWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVPWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.31%

-49.04%

+11.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-4.05%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-14.31%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-16.36%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

-37.67%

+0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.51%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-9.50%

+5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.20%

+0.44%

Volatility

VOOV vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.01%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVPWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

2.35%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.06%

6.62%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

9.31%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.35%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

17.16%

-0.21%

VOOV vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOOV vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than PWV's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
1.81%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOV and PWV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWV has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to VOOV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs PWV's -49.04%.

On 10-year performance, VOOV leads with 11.82% vs 11.81% for PWV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.

PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.68% for VOOV.

VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.58% for PWV.

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOV and PWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer