PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 17.80%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.09% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
10.10%
6M
9.55%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.80%

XME

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
14.53%
6M
20.99%
1Y
84.92%
3Y*
35.78%
5Y*
21.45%
10Y*
19.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.10%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
14.53%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and XME is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.52

The correlation between VOOG and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOOG vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
XME

Technology

49.4%
2.2%

Communication Services

18.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

-

Financial Services

8.8%

-

Industrials

6.2%
0.4%

Healthcare

5.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
0.8%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%
75.3%

Energy

0.1%
23.4%

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
XME
2.2%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
XME

-

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
XME

-

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
XME

-

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
XME
0.4%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
XME

-

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
XME
0.8%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
XME

-

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
XME

-

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
XME
75.3%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
XME
23.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOGXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.78

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

9.55

-0.81

VOOG vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOGXMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.40

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.66

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.58

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.16

+0.73

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-85.89%

+53.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-22.60%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-30.47%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-37.27%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-61.69%

+28.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-10.72%

+6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-44.12%

+39.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

8.92%

-5.59%

Volatility

VOOG vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) is 5.61%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 14.01%. This indicates that VOOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

14.01%

-8.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

27.83%

-14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

35.60%

-19.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

32.72%

-11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

32.91%

-12.14%

VOOG vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOOG vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and XME have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to VOOG (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.09% vs 17.80% for VOOG. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.09% return vs 17.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.

VOOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while XME is Materials. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.35% for XME.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer