PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 18.15%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
-0.93%
1M
7.44%
YTD
13.78%
6M
13.58%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.15%

SPYV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.77%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.78%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
7.46%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and SPYV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between VOOG and SPYV has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOOG vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
SPYV

Technology

49.4%
21.2%

Communication Services

18.0%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.9%

Financial Services

8.8%
14.7%

Industrials

6.2%
10.6%

Healthcare

5.8%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
9.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
3.3%

Utilities

0.4%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.4%
3.4%

Energy

0.1%
7.4%

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
SPYV
21.2%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
SPYV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
SPYV
10.9%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
SPYV
14.7%

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
SPYV
10.6%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
SPYV
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
SPYV
9.2%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
SPYV
3.3%

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
SPYV
4.4%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
SPYV
3.4%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
SPYV
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOGSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.43

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

13.16

-2.84

VOOG vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOGSPYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.17

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.75

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.70

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.42

+0.49

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-58.45%

+25.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-6.22%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-17.54%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-17.89%

-14.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-36.89%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.57%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-8.72%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

1.62%

+1.69%

Volatility

VOOG vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

1.98%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

7.04%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

9.84%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

14.40%

+6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

16.94%

+3.79%

VOOG vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOG vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SPYV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and SPYV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 18.15% vs 11.90% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOG.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.44% for VOOG.

VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer