PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VOOG having a 13.78% return and IVOO slightly higher at 14.13%. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed IVOO with an annualized return of 18.15%, while IVOO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
-0.93%
1M
7.44%
YTD
13.78%
6M
13.58%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.15%

IVOO

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.90%
YTD
14.13%
6M
14.37%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.78%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.13%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and IVOO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.76

The correlation between VOOG and IVOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOOG vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
IVOO

Technology

49.4%
15.7%

Communication Services

18.0%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.7%

Financial Services

8.8%
14.4%

Industrials

6.2%
25.1%

Healthcare

5.8%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
3.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
7.5%

Utilities

0.4%
3.1%

Basic Materials

0.4%
4.8%

Energy

0.1%
5.5%

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
IVOO
15.7%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
IVOO
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
IVOO
10.7%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
IVOO
14.4%

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
IVOO
25.1%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
IVOO
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
IVOO
3.8%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
IVOO
7.5%

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
IVOO
3.1%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
IVOO
4.8%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
IVOO
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOGIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.91

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

10.61

-0.30

VOOG vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOGIVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.65

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.42

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.53

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.62

+0.29

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-42.33%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-8.81%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-24.22%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-24.22%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-42.33%

+9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.02%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-5.27%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.41%

+0.90%

Volatility

VOOG vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) have volatilities of 4.32% and 4.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

4.39%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

11.36%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

15.56%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

19.72%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

21.19%

-0.46%

VOOG vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOG vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and IVOO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOO has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to VOOG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 18.15% vs 11.22% for IVOO. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOO.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.44% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while IVOO is Small Cap Growth Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.10% for IVOO.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer