PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than IVOO's 15.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed IVOO with an annualized return of 17.47%, while IVOO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
2.24%
1M
2.08%
6M
11.48%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
25.95%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
17.47%
ALL TIME*
16.80%

IVOO

1D
1.15%
1M
0.12%
6M
10.44%
YTD
15.90%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
10.93%
ALL TIME*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.81M$9.39M$9.90M
$101.77M$105.65M$128.52M

VOOG vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
12.44%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
15.90%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and IVOO is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.76

The correlation between VOOG and IVOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOOG vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
IVOO

Technology

52.4%
17.4%

Communication Services

15.6%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
10.5%

Financial Services

8.6%
13.8%

Industrials

6.4%
25.4%

Healthcare

6.2%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
7.2%

Utilities

0.4%
2.8%

Basic Materials

0.3%
4.8%

Energy

0.1%
4.6%

Technology

VOOG
52.4%
IVOO
17.4%

Communication Services

VOOG
15.6%
IVOO
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
8.6%
IVOO
10.5%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.6%
IVOO
13.8%

Industrials

VOOG
6.4%
IVOO
25.4%

Healthcare

VOOG
6.2%
IVOO
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
IVOO
3.2%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
IVOO
7.2%

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
IVOO
2.8%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.3%
IVOO
4.8%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
IVOO
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOOG vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOGIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.77

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

10.07

-3.61

VOOG vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-42.33%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-8.81%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-24.22%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-24.22%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-42.33%

+9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-1.20%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-5.23%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

2.42%

+1.35%

Volatility

VOOG vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 3.61%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

3.61%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

11.64%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

15.68%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.55%

19.66%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

21.16%

-0.27%

VOOG vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VOOG and IVOO have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOG vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IVOO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.17%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and IVOO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to IVOO (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.47% vs 10.93% for IVOO. Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.47% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG and IVOO have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while IVOO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index.

IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer