PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VOOG having a 9.67% return and EFA slightly lower at 9.36%. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed EFA with an annualized return of 17.86%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.61%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
17.86%

EFA

1D
0.28%
1M
3.24%
YTD
9.36%
6M
10.80%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.67%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
9.36%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and EFA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.73

The correlation between VOOG and EFA shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOOG vs. EFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
EFA

Technology

49.4%
12.1%

Communication Services

18.0%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
7.4%

Financial Services

8.8%
24.1%

Industrials

6.2%
18.9%

Healthcare

5.8%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
6.7%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.6%

Utilities

0.4%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.4%
6.2%

Energy

0.1%
3.8%

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
EFA
12.1%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
EFA
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
EFA
7.4%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
EFA
24.1%

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
EFA
18.9%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
EFA
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
EFA
6.7%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
EFA
1.6%

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
EFA
3.7%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
EFA
6.2%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
EFA
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOGEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.79

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

6.67

+1.44

VOOG vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-61.04%

+28.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-11.42%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-14.05%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-29.53%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-34.19%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-0.61%

-4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-11.92%

+6.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.07%

+0.33%

Volatility

VOOG vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) at 5.50%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

5.50%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

13.19%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

15.64%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

16.58%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

17.27%

+3.51%

VOOG vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOOG vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than EFA's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.09%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and EFA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to EFA (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs EFA's -61.04%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.86% vs 9.84% for EFA. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, EFA has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EFA.

EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while EFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.32% for EFA.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer