VT vs. QQQ
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.84%/yr vs 22.17%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
VT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 12.84%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.17% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 6M
- 12.88%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
QQQ
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 40.68%
- 3Y*
- 27.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- 22.17%
VT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.44% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and QQQ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VT and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
QQQ
Financial Services
VT
QQQ
Industrials
VT
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
VT
QQQ
Communication Services
VT
QQQ
Healthcare
VT
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
VT
QQQ
Energy
VT
QQQ
Basic Materials
VT
QQQ
Utilities
VT
QQQ
Real Estate
VT
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
VT
QQQ
VT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.42 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 12.72 | +0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -82.97% | +32.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -11.96% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -22.77% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -35.12% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -35.12% | +0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.74% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -32.73% | +25.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 3.21% | -0.99% |
Volatility
VT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.36%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.58%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 8.58% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 14.34% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 17.64% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 22.63% | -6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 22.42% | -5.14% |
VT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to VT (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.17% vs 12.84% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.17% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer