VOO vs. UC15.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.23%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for UC15.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.

Performance

VOO vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VOO is traded in USD, while UC15.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC15.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.20% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed UC15.L with an annualized return of 15.23%, while UC15.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.

VOO

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.18%
• 1Y: 25.87%
• 3Y*: 21.52%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 15.23%

UC15.L

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 21.20%
• 6M: 21.79%
• 1Y: 29.95%
• 3Y*: 13.16%
• 5Y*: 11.58%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.45%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	21.20%	10.31%	4.66%	-1.58%	16.07%	34.87%	0.50%	9.54%	-10.61%	6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and UC15.L is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013	0.23

The correlation between VOO and UC15.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOO vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOO	UC15.L
Technology	35.7%	31.0%
Financial Services	11.6%	10.9%
Communication Services	11.3%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	7.3%
Healthcare	8.5%	9.8%
Industrials	8.3%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.7%
Energy	3.5%	14.2%
Utilities	2.4%	1.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.5%

Return for Risk

VOO vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 66
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

UC15.L

UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VOO	UC15.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.17	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.86	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.40	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	6.36	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.53	14.17	-0.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VOO vs. UC15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the UC15.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and UC15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VOO	UC15.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.17	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.77	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.61	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.26	+0.62

Drawdowns

VOO vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and UC15.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOO	UC15.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-51.79%	+17.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-4.88%	-4.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-11.19%	-7.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	-18.05%	-6.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.99%	-35.40%	+1.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-3.98%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-20.55%	+16.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.20%	-0.28%

Volatility

VOO vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.74%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOO	UC15.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	4.83%	-1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	11.92%	-2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.10%	14.32%	-2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	15.02%	+1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.02%	14.62%	+3.40%

VOO vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOO vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOO and UC15.L in my portfolio?

VOO and UC15.L have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VOO or UC15.L?

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOO or UC15.L?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.

What is the main difference between VOO and UC15.L?

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while UC15.L is Commodities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.34% for UC15.L.