VOO vs. SLVP
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.72%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
VOO vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 15.72%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively lower 13.10% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 27.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
SLVP
- 1D
- 6.68%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 93.96%
- 3Y*
- 52.67%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
VOO vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.99% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 0.95% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and SLVP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.23 |
The correlation between VOO and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOO vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
SLVP
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
SLVP
-
Financial Services
VOO
SLVP
Communication Services
VOO
SLVP
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
SLVP
-
Healthcare
VOO
SLVP
-
Industrials
VOO
SLVP
-
Consumer Defensive
VOO
SLVP
-
Energy
VOO
SLVP
-
Utilities
VOO
SLVP
-
Real Estate
VOO
SLVP
-
Basic Materials
VOO
SLVP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
SLVP
VOO vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.28 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.48 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | 6.54 | +7.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -80.47% | +46.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -38.06% | +29.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -38.06% | +19.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -49.79% | +25.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -62.03% | +28.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -27.18% | +26.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -46.77% | +43.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 14.41% | -12.44% |
Volatility
VOO vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.61%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 20.77%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 20.77% | -16.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 45.32% | -35.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 55.01% | -42.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 43.26% | -26.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 42.48% | -24.43% |
VOO vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SLVP's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.17% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and SLVP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (20.77%) compared to VOO (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.72% vs 13.10% for SLVP. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.72% return vs 13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while SLVP is Silver. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.39% for SLVP.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer