PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. MDLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 15.50%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.09% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

MDLZ

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.22%
YTD
18.03%
6M
18.65%
1Y
-2.75%
3Y*
-1.98%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
6.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
18.03%-7.03%-15.30%11.17%2.92%15.87%8.58%40.42%-4.27%-1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and MDLZ is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.46

The correlation between VOO and MDLZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLZ
MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOMDLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.98

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.17

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

-0.30

+12.73

VOO vs. MDLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the MDLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and MDLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum MDLZ drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and MDLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOMDLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-42.52%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-25.93%

+17.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-29.00%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-29.14%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-29.74%

-4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-12.59%

+10.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-11.03%

+7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

14.70%

-12.73%

Volatility

VOO vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOMDLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

5.46%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

16.28%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

22.26%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

19.52%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

21.03%

-3.00%

Dividends

VOO vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than MDLZ's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
3.13%3.60%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and MDLZ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDLZ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and MDLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer