VOO vs. IWD
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IWD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.72%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for IWD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWD.
Performance
VOO vs. IWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 16.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed IWD with an annualized return of 15.72%, while IWD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.56% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 27.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
IWD
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 31.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
VOO vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.99% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 16.71% | 15.68% | 14.17% | 11.34% | -7.75% | 24.95% | 2.73% | 26.12% | -8.45% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and IWD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.91 |
The correlation between VOO and IWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (3 years) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOO vs. IWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
IWD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
IWD
Financial Services
VOO
IWD
Communication Services
VOO
IWD
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
IWD
Healthcare
VOO
IWD
Industrials
VOO
IWD
Consumer Defensive
VOO
IWD
Energy
VOO
IWD
Utilities
VOO
IWD
Real Estate
VOO
IWD
Basic Materials
VOO
IWD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
IWD
VOO vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 4.60 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | 19.12 | -4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IWD drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -60.10% | +26.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -6.79% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -15.71% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -19.04% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -38.51% | +4.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | 0.00% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -8.64% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.63% | +0.34% |
Volatility
VOO vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 4.04%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.04% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 8.55% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 11.19% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 14.88% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 17.32% | +0.73% |
VOO vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IWD's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than IWD's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.78% | 1.69% | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and IWD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to IWD (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IWD's -60.10%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.72% vs 11.56% for IWD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.72% return vs 11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWD.
IWD has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IWD is Large Cap Value Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.18% for IWD.
IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and IWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer