PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. IJK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. IJK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than IJK's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed IJK with an annualized return of 15.41%, while IJK has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.


VOO

1D
1.68%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
8.49%
6M
7.67%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
15.41%

IJK

1D
2.99%
1M
2.01%
YTD
18.08%
6M
15.02%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. IJK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.49%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
18.08%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and IJK is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.88

The correlation between VOO and IJK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. IJK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
IJK

Technology

35.7%
21.8%

Financial Services

11.6%
7.3%

Communication Services

11.3%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
7.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
13.5%

Industrials

8.3%
31.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
2.1%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.4%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
5.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.6%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
IJK
21.8%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
IJK
7.3%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
IJK
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
IJK
7.9%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
IJK
13.5%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
IJK
31.1%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
IJK
2.1%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
IJK
3.7%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
IJK
2.0%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
IJK
5.5%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
IJK
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. IJK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. IJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOIJKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.92

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

11.46

+0.88

VOO vs. IJK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the IJK Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and IJK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. IJK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IJK drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IJK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOIJKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-54.47%

+20.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.92%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-25.63%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-29.24%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-39.25%

+5.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-1.12%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-10.79%

+7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.53%

-0.57%

Volatility

VOO vs. IJK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOIJKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

6.04%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

13.88%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

17.57%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

20.78%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

21.10%

-3.07%

VOO vs. IJK - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IJK's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. IJK - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than IJK's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
0.55%0.66%0.79%1.13%1.08%0.50%0.70%1.09%1.13%0.93%1.15%1.12%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and IJK have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJK has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IJK's -54.47%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.41% vs 11.62% for IJK. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.41% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.55% for IJK.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IJK is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.17% for IJK.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and IJK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer