VOO vs. IJK
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IJK is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.41%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for IJK. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for IJK.
Performance
VOO vs. IJK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than IJK's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed IJK with an annualized return of 15.41%, while IJK has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
IJK
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 18.08%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
VOO vs. IJK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.49% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 18.08% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 22.45% | 25.96% | -10.53% | 19.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and IJK is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VOO and IJK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. IJK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
IJK
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
IJK
Financial Services
VOO
IJK
Communication Services
VOO
IJK
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
IJK
Healthcare
VOO
IJK
Industrials
VOO
IJK
Consumer Defensive
VOO
IJK
Energy
VOO
IJK
Utilities
VOO
IJK
Real Estate
VOO
IJK
Basic Materials
VOO
IJK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. IJK — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
IJK
VOO vs. IJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.92 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | 11.46 | +0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. IJK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IJK drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IJK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -54.47% | +20.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -9.92% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -25.63% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -29.24% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -39.25% | +5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -1.12% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -10.79% | +7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.53% | -0.57% |
Volatility
VOO vs. IJK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 6.04% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 13.88% | -4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 17.57% | -5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 20.78% | -3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 21.10% | -3.07% |
VOO vs. IJK - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IJK's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. IJK - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than IJK's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.55% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and IJK have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJK has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IJK's -54.47%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.41% vs 11.62% for IJK. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.41% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.55% for IJK.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IJK is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.17% for IJK.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and IJK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer