VOO vs. IHI
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 14.98%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for IHI. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IHI.
Performance
VOO vs. IHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than IHI's -18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed IHI with an annualized return of 14.98%, while IHI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.42% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.77%
IHI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 1Y
- -15.42%
- 3Y*
- -3.77%
- 5Y*
- -3.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.83%
VOO vs. IHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.44% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -18.43% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and IHI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and IHI has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VOO vs. IHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
IHI
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VOO
IHI
Financial Services
VOO
IHI
-
Communication Services
VOO
IHI
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
IHI
-
Healthcare
VOO
IHI
Industrials
VOO
IHI
Consumer Defensive
VOO
IHI
-
Energy
VOO
IHI
-
Utilities
VOO
IHI
-
Real Estate
VOO
IHI
-
Basic Materials
VOO
IHI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. IHI — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
IHI
VOO vs. IHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.88 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | -0.59 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.63 | -1.22 | +10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. IHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IHI drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -49.65% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -26.11% | +17.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -26.64% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -33.12% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -33.25% | -0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -22.98% | +20.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -8.41% | +4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 12.70% | -10.66% |
Volatility
VOO vs. IHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.36%, while iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 9.63% | -6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 16.15% | -6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 19.55% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 19.48% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 19.98% | -1.98% |
VOO vs. IHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. IHI - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than IHI's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.48% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and IHI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to VOO (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IHI's -49.65%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 14.98% vs 8.42% for IHI. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IHI.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.48% for IHI.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IHI is Health & Biotech Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.38% for IHI.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and IHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer