VOO vs. FUQA.L

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FUQA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOO returned 13.93%/yr vs 12.05%/yr for FUQA.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUQA.L.

Performance

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VOO is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 8.54% return.

VOO

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 27.95%
• 3Y*: 21.25%
• 5Y*: 13.93%
• 10Y*: 15.72%

FUQA.L

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 2.36%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: 24.03%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 12.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.99%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	15.89%
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	8.54%	16.75%	17.51%	17.75%	-10.69%	26.66%	11.54%	32.33%	-4.62%	-7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and FUQA.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017	0.56

The correlation between VOO and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOO	FUQA.L
Technology	35.6%	35.0%
Financial Services	11.6%	12.6%
Communication Services	11.1%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.5%	9.1%
Industrials	8.0%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.5%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.8%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	2.2%

Return for Risk

VOO vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 78
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FUQA.L

FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOO	FUQA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.39	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.65	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.44	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	3.00	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.25	13.26	+0.99

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and FUQA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOO	FUQA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-35.38%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-7.97%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-19.14%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	-20.19%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	0.00%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-6.82%	+3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.80%	+0.17%

Volatility

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.60%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOO	FUQA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	2.60%	+2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	7.39%	+2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	10.02%	+2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	19.99%	-3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	23.09%	-5.04%

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VOO vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.03%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOO and FUQA.L in my portfolio?

VOO and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VOO or FUQA.L?

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOO or FUQA.L?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.

What is the main difference between VOO and FUQA.L?

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while FUQA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.25% for FUQA.L.