FUQA.L vs. XNAQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L).
FUQA.L and XNAQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FUQA.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. It was launched on Mar 27, 2017. XNAQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. Both FUQA.L and XNAQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FUQA.L or XNAQ.L.
Key characteristics
| FUQA.L | XNAQ.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.32% | 12.13% |
| 1Y Return | 18.92% | 21.26% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.12% | 10.48% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.84 | 1.37 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.77% | 16.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.34% | -27.52% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.22% | -7.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUQA.L and XNAQ.L is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FUQA.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FUQA.L achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly higher than XNAQ.L's 12.13% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUQA.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUQA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FUQA.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FUQA.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FUQA.L nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FUQA.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAQ.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUQA.L and XNAQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FUQA.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) is 4.54%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that FUQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.