PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUQA.L vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FUQA.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUQA.L is traded in GBp, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUQA.L achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.90% return.


FUQA.L

1D
1.00%
1M
1.72%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.76%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.09%
1M
0.36%
YTD
9.90%
6M
8.80%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUQA.L vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
9.37%8.56%19.50%11.85%-0.00%27.82%8.23%27.23%1.10%-13.91%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.90%8.10%25.46%18.02%-9.86%28.09%12.84%23.98%-0.68%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FUQA.L and ^GSPC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.54

The correlation between FUQA.L and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUQA.L vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUQA.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUQA.L^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.38

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

3.09

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.02

11.34

+5.68

FUQA.L vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUQA.L and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUQA.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -37.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUQA.L and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUQA.L^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.34%

-37.07%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-8.03%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

-22.15%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.49%

-22.15%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.66%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-5.30%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

2.18%

-0.68%

Volatility

FUQA.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) is 2.63%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that FUQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUQA.L^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

4.35%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

8.96%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

12.03%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

15.96%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

18.09%

+4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUQA.L and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUQA.L and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer