PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VOO vs. FLAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VOO vs. FLAU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FLAU is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOO returned 13.43%/yr vs 6.14%/yr for FLAU. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLAU.

Performance

VOO vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than FLAU's 11.38% return.

VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

FLAU

1D
1.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
11.38%
6M
12.15%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%3.81%
FLAU
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF		11.38%15.95%1.81%12.58%-5.58%9.90%11.00%23.38%-10.17%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and FLAU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.68

The correlation between VOO and FLAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. FLAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VOO
FLAU

Technology

35.6%
1.8%

Financial Services

11.6%
37.1%

Communication Services

11.1%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
4.3%

Industrials

8.0%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.7%

Energy

3.5%
4.8%

Utilities

2.8%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
26.6%

Technology

VOO
35.6%
FLAU
1.8%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
FLAU
37.1%

Communication Services

VOO
11.1%
FLAU
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.1%
FLAU
6.6%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
FLAU
4.3%

Industrials

VOO
8.0%
FLAU
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
FLAU
3.7%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
FLAU
4.8%

Utilities

VOO
2.8%
FLAU
1.6%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
FLAU
6.0%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
FLAU
26.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Franklin FTSE Australia ETF

Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. IVV
Often compared with FLAU:
FLAU vs. EWAFLAU vs. FLBRFLAU vs. FLGBFLAU vs. EPIFLAU vs. PEYFLAU vs. BCDFLAU vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

VOO vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
FLAU
FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VOOFLAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.99
0.88

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.70
1.30

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.16

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.50

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

4.50

+7.92

VOO vs. FLAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the FLAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and FLAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and FLAU.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VOOFLAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-45.73%

+11.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-10.01%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-22.03%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-24.68%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-2.31%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-6.78%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.34%

-1.37%

Volatility

VOO vs. FLAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VOOFLAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

5.83%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

14.31%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

17.15%

-4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

19.68%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

23.59%

-5.56%

VOO vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FLAU's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VOO vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FLAU's 2.92% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAU
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF		2.92%3.25%3.37%3.62%5.91%5.14%2.18%4.37%4.34%0.18%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

VOO and FLAU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAU has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs FLAU's -45.73%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.43% vs 6.14% for FLAU. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLAU.

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while FLAU is Asia Pacific Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.09% for FLAU.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and FLAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer