PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. FDTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than FDTS's 20.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed FDTS with an annualized return of 15.72%, while FDTS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.10% annualized return.


VOO

1D
1.74%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.99%
6M
11.51%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
15.72%

FDTS

1D
1.22%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
20.23%
6M
21.36%
1Y
46.49%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.99%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
20.23%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and FDTS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.44

Over the past year, VOO and FDTS have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

VOO vs. FDTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
FDTS

Technology

35.6%
14.1%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.9%

Communication Services

11.1%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
18.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
2.8%

Industrials

8.0%
22.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
4.0%

Utilities

2.8%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
11.3%

Technology

VOO
35.6%
FDTS
14.1%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
FDTS
11.9%

Communication Services

VOO
11.1%
FDTS
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.1%
FDTS
18.9%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
FDTS
2.8%

Industrials

VOO
8.0%
FDTS
22.2%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
FDTS
4.7%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
FDTS
4.0%

Utilities

VOO
2.8%
FDTS
2.7%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
FDTS
4.3%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
FDTS
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOFDTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.71

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

12.72

+1.53

VOO vs. FDTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FDTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and FDTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum FDTS drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and FDTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOFDTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-51.26%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-12.61%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-13.19%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-33.11%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-51.26%

+17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-3.61%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-10.64%

+6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.67%

-1.70%

Volatility

VOO vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.61%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOFDTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

8.52%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

15.57%

-5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

18.23%

-5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

29.43%

-12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

24.87%

-6.82%

VOO vs. FDTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FDTS's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.50%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and FDTS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to VOO (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs FDTS's -51.26%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.72% vs 11.10% for FDTS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.72% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while FDTS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and FDTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer