VOO vs. DOG
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.50%/yr vs -11.31%/yr for DOG. At a correlation of -0.91, they often move in opposite directions. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.
Performance
VOO vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than DOG's -4.92% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed DOG with an annualized return of 15.50%, while DOG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.31% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
DOG
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -4.92%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- -14.29%
- 3Y*
- -8.19%
- 5Y*
- -5.62%
- 10Y*
- -11.31%
VOO vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.92% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and DOG is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | -0.91 |
The correlation between VOO and DOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.91 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. DOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
DOG
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VOO
DOG
-
Financial Services
VOO
DOG
Communication Services
VOO
DOG
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
DOG
-
Healthcare
VOO
DOG
-
Industrials
VOO
DOG
-
Consumer Defensive
VOO
DOG
-
Energy
VOO
DOG
-
Utilities
VOO
DOG
-
Real Estate
VOO
DOG
-
Basic Materials
VOO
DOG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
DOG
VOO vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.85 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | -0.84 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | -1.38 | +13.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -92.73% | +58.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -15.09% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -29.16% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -34.35% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -70.95% | +36.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -92.67% | +90.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -66.41% | +62.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 9.18% | -7.21% |
Volatility
VOO vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 4.36% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 9.87% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 12.56% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 14.86% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 17.51% | +0.52% |
VOO vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than DOG's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.52% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and DOG have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOG has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs DOG's -92.73%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs -11.31% for DOG. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs -11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DOG.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while DOG is Inverse Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.95% for DOG.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer