PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. BTCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. BTCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than BTCO's -27.65% return.


VOO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
15.35%

BTCO

1D
5.10%
1M
-20.91%
YTD
-27.65%
6M
-30.32%
1Y
-39.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. BTCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.82%24.69%
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
-27.65%-6.58%100.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and BTCO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. BTCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCO
BTCO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. BTCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOBTCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.86

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

-0.76

+3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

-1.36

+14.34

VOO vs. BTCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the BTCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and BTCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOBTCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

-0.90

+2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.27

+0.61

Drawdowns

VOO vs. BTCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum BTCO drawdown of -52.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and BTCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOBTCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-52.05%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-52.05%

+43.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-49.60%

+46.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-16.12%

+12.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

28.93%

-27.01%

Volatility

VOO vs. BTCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a volatility of 11.78%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOBTCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

11.78%

-8.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

34.52%

-25.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

44.10%

-32.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

49.90%

-33.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

49.90%

-31.87%

VOO vs. BTCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. BTCO - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and BTCO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCO has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs BTCO's -52.05%.

On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 24.91% vs -39.40% for BTCO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 24.91% return vs -39.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for BTCO.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for BTCO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while BTCO is Cryptocurrency. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while BTCO tracks Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.39% for BTCO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and BTCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer