PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. BTCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. BTCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than BTCO's -25.69% return.


VOO

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.57%
6M
7.90%
YTD
9.44%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
14.98%
ALL TIME*
14.77%

BTCO

1D
1.54%
1M
3.42%
6M
-31.95%
YTD
-25.69%
1Y
-44.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. BTCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.44%17.82%24.65%
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
-25.69%-6.58%93.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and BTCO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. BTCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCO
BTCO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. BTCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOBTCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.83

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

-0.84

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

-1.34

+10.97

VOO vs. BTCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the BTCO Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and BTCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. BTCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum BTCO drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and BTCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOBTCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-53.33%

+19.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-53.33%

+44.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-48.23%

+46.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-17.70%

+14.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

33.39%

-31.35%

Volatility

VOO vs. BTCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.36%, while Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOBTCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

10.57%

-7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

34.51%

-24.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

44.25%

-31.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

49.38%

-32.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

49.38%

-31.38%

VOO vs. BTCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. BTCO - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and BTCO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCO has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to VOO (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs BTCO's -53.33%.

On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 19.65% vs -44.68% for BTCO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 19.65% return vs -44.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BTCO.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for BTCO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while BTCO is Cryptocurrency. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while BTCO tracks Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.25% for BTCO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and BTCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer