BTCO vs. BTC-USD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD).
BTCO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate. It was launched on Jan 11, 2024.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BTCO or BTC-USD.
Key characteristics
| BTCO | BTC-USD | |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Std Dev | 58.35% | 39.14% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.69% | -93.07% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.14% | -13.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCO and BTC-USD is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BTCO vs. BTC-USD - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BTCO vs. BTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDrawdowns
BTCO vs. BTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -22.69%, smaller than the maximum BTC-USD drawdown of -93.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and BTC-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BTCO vs. BTC-USD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD) have volatilities of 14.88% and 14.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.