VOO vs. BCHS.L

Last updated Jun 11, 2026

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BCHS.L (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while BCHS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOO returned 12.93%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for BCHS.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BCHS.L.

Performance

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VOO is traded in USD, while BCHS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCHS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than BCHS.L's 16.86% return.

VOO

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -1.84%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 21.76%
• 3Y*: 20.69%
• 5Y*: 12.93%
• 10Y*: 15.13%

BCHS.L

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -4.77%
• YTD: 16.86%
• 6M: 8.44%
• 1Y: 43.17%
• 3Y*: 42.42%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	6.70%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	19.40%
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	16.86%	45.45%	16.53%	66.63%	-52.00%	24.86%	94.85%	-10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and BCHS.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019	0.46

The correlation between VOO and BCHS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOO	BCHS.L
Technology	35.7%	30.6%
Financial Services	11.6%	57.4%
Communication Services	11.3%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	6.4%
Healthcare	8.5%	0.0%
Industrials	8.3%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	0.0%
Energy	3.5%	0.0%
Utilities	2.4%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.0%

Return for Risk

VOO vs. BCHS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 62
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BCHS.L

BCHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BCHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BCHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BCHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BCHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VOO	BCHS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.09	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.65	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.19	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	1.41	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.16	2.95	+8.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and BCHS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VOO	BCHS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	1.09	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.25	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.49	+0.38

Drawdowns

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum BCHS.L drawdown of -61.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and BCHS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOO	BCHS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-61.43%	+27.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-30.45%	+21.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-35.24%	+16.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	-60.92%	+36.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.47%	-11.37%	+6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-26.10%	+22.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	14.61%	-12.66%

Volatility

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.97%, while Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOO	BCHS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	12.70%	-8.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.45%	27.25%	-17.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	39.32%	-27.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	39.82%	-22.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	38.12%	-20.09%

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHS.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOO vs. BCHS.L - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while BCHS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.07%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOO and BCHS.L in my portfolio?

VOO and BCHS.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VOO or BCHS.L?

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOO or BCHS.L?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHS.L.

What is the main difference between VOO and BCHS.L?

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while BCHS.L is Technology Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while BCHS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.65% for BCHS.L.