BCHS.L vs. XLKQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) and Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L).
BCHS.L and XLKQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCHS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 8, 2019. XLKQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both BCHS.L and XLKQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BCHS.L or XLKQ.L.
Key characteristics
| BCHS.L | XLKQ.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.88% | 16.16% |
| 1Y Return | 43.24% | 50.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.84% | 23.62% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.41% | 25.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.61 | 2.57 |
| Daily Std Dev | 63.71% | 19.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.89% | -23.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -31.22% | -1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCHS.L and XLKQ.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BCHS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BCHS.L achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 16.16% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCHS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCHS.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BCHS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) and Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BCHS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCHS.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BCHS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCHS.L drawdown since its inception was -55.89%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHS.L and XLKQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BCHS.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a higher volatility of 13.11% compared to Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) at 7.70%. This indicates that BCHS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.