BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) and VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAGB.L).
BCHS.L and DAGB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCHS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 8, 2019. DAGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Apr 30, 2021. Both BCHS.L and DAGB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | -5.58% | 35.24% | 18.50% | 58.28% | -46.25% | -2.16% |
DAGB.L VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc | -9.88% | 2.77% | 31.18% | 325.83% | -85.21% | -24.14% |
Different Trading Currencies
BCHS.L is traded in GBp, while DAGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DAGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCHS.L achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly higher than DAGB.L's -9.88% return.
BCHS.L
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -5.58%
- 6M
- -13.64%
- 1Y
- 51.78%
- 3Y*
- 29.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
DAGB.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -9.44%
- YTD
- -9.88%
- 6M
- -32.68%
- 1Y
- 53.86%
- 3Y*
- 44.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BCHS.L and DAGB.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Return for Risk
BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
BCHS.L
DAGB.L
BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) and VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCHS.L | DAGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.87 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.47 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.02 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 2.05 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCHS.L | DAGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.87 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | -0.15 | +0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCHS.L and DAGB.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCHS.L nor DAGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCHS.L drawdown since its inception was -55.89%, smaller than the maximum DAGB.L drawdown of -91.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHS.L and DAGB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCHS.L | DAGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.89% | -91.23% | +35.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.49% | -45.63% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.72% | -53.64% | +26.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.65% | -58.23% | +36.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.67% | 22.82% | -9.15% |
Volatility
BCHS.L vs. DAGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) is 11.20%, while VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAGB.L) has a volatility of 14.91%. This indicates that BCHS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCHS.L | DAGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 14.91% | -3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.70% | 46.14% | -16.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.98% | 61.33% | -20.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.66% | 72.25% | -36.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.34% | 72.25% | -37.91% |