PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. CBSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. CBSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than CBSE's 32.18% return.


VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%

CBSE

1D
-0.93%
1M
10.89%
YTD
32.18%
6M
29.85%
1Y
51.66%
3Y*
31.65%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONV vs. CBSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.28%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%5.52%
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
32.18%19.53%32.20%17.29%-19.92%14.57%16.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and CBSE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.73

The correlation between VONV and CBSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. CBSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CBSE
CBSE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONV vs. CBSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONVCBSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.37

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

3.83

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

11.59

+5.95

VONV vs. CBSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the CBSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and CBSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONVCBSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.30

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.52

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.80

-0.09

Drawdowns

VONV vs. CBSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, which is greater than CBSE's maximum drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and CBSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVCBSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-36.30%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-13.57%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-29.40%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-36.30%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.93%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-12.31%

+8.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

4.47%

-2.85%

Volatility

VONV vs. CBSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) is 2.94%, while Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that VONV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVCBSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

7.80%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

17.58%

-9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

22.55%

-11.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

24.06%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

23.79%

-6.55%

VONV vs. CBSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CBSE's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

VONV vs. CBSE - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than CBSE's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
0.26%0.35%0.37%1.50%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONV and CBSE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBSE has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to VONV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs CBSE's -36.30%.

On 5-year performance, CBSE leads with 12.52% vs 10.30% for VONV. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CBSE has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.

VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.26% for CBSE.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Clough. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.85% for CBSE.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and CBSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer